[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201108151835.5d78ebca@archlinux>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2020 15:18:35 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
<olivier.moysan@...com>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: stm32-adc: adapt clock duty cycle for proper
operation
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:57:26 +0100
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com> wrote:
> For proper operation, STM32 ADC should be used with a clock duty cycle
> of 50%, in the range of 49% to 51%. Depending on the clock tree, divider
> can be used in case clock duty cycle is out of this range.
> In case clk_get_scaled_duty_cycle() returns an error, kindly apply a
> divider by default (don't make the probe fail).
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
Hi Fabrice,
This sounds like it's a fix for a situation in which the device is not
currently working? If so, please let me know a fixes tag.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c
> index cd870c0..d64a9e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c
> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static int stm32h7_adc_clk_sel(struct platform_device *pdev,
> {
> u32 ckmode, presc, val;
> unsigned long rate;
> - int i, div;
> + int i, div, duty;
>
> /* stm32h7 bus clock is common for all ADC instances (mandatory) */
> if (!priv->bclk) {
> @@ -226,6 +226,11 @@ static int stm32h7_adc_clk_sel(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + /* If duty is an error, kindly use at least /2 divider */
> + duty = clk_get_scaled_duty_cycle(priv->aclk, 100);
> + if (duty < 0)
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "adc clock duty: %d\n", duty);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stm32h7_adc_ckmodes_spec); i++) {
> ckmode = stm32h7_adc_ckmodes_spec[i].ckmode;
> presc = stm32h7_adc_ckmodes_spec[i].presc;
> @@ -234,6 +239,13 @@ static int stm32h7_adc_clk_sel(struct platform_device *pdev,
> if (ckmode)
> continue;
>
> + /*
> + * For proper operation, clock duty cycle range is 49%
> + * to 51%. Apply at least /2 prescaler otherwise.
> + */
> + if (div == 1 && (duty < 49 || duty > 51))
> + continue;
> +
> if ((rate / div) <= priv->max_clk_rate)
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -246,6 +258,10 @@ static int stm32h7_adc_clk_sel(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + duty = clk_get_scaled_duty_cycle(priv->bclk, 100);
> + if (duty < 0)
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "bus clock duty: %d\n", duty);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stm32h7_adc_ckmodes_spec); i++) {
> ckmode = stm32h7_adc_ckmodes_spec[i].ckmode;
> presc = stm32h7_adc_ckmodes_spec[i].presc;
> @@ -254,6 +270,9 @@ static int stm32h7_adc_clk_sel(struct platform_device *pdev,
> if (!ckmode)
> continue;
>
> + if (div == 1 && (duty < 49 || duty > 51))
> + continue;
> +
> if ((rate / div) <= priv->max_clk_rate)
> goto out;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists