[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201108153409.723eeb8c@archlinux>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2020 15:34:09 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Artur Rojek <contact@...ur-rojek.eu>
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>, od@...c.me,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio/adc: ingenic: Fix battery VREF for JZ4770 SoC
On Thu, 05 Nov 2020 01:27:51 +0100
Artur Rojek <contact@...ur-rojek.eu> wrote:
> On 2020-11-05 01:09, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> > Hi Artur,
> >
> > Le mer. 4 nov. 2020 à 23:29, Artur Rojek <contact@...ur-rojek.eu> a
> > écrit :
> >> Hi Paul,
> >>
> >> On 2020-11-04 20:28, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> >>> The reference voltage for the battery is clearly marked as 1.2V in
> >>> the
> >>> programming manual. With this fixed, the battery channel now returns
> >>> correct values.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: a515d6488505 ("IIO: Ingenic JZ47xx: Add support for JZ4770 SoC
> >>> ADC.")
> >>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/iio/adc/ingenic-adc.c | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ingenic-adc.c
> >>> b/drivers/iio/adc/ingenic-adc.c
> >>> index ecaff6a9b716..19b95905a45c 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ingenic-adc.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ingenic-adc.c
> >>> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
> >>> #define JZ4725B_ADC_BATTERY_HIGH_VREF_BITS 10
> >>> #define JZ4740_ADC_BATTERY_HIGH_VREF (7500 * 0.986)
> >>> #define JZ4740_ADC_BATTERY_HIGH_VREF_BITS 12
> >>> -#define JZ4770_ADC_BATTERY_VREF 6600
> >>> +#define JZ4770_ADC_BATTERY_VREF 1200
> >>> #define JZ4770_ADC_BATTERY_VREF_BITS 12
> >>>
> >>> #define JZ_ADC_IRQ_AUX BIT(0)
> >>
> >> I thought we set it to 6600 because GCW Zero was not showing correct
> >> battery values at 1200.
> >> But if you verified that 1200 works with JZ4770, then:
> >> Acked-by: Artur Rojek <contact@...ur-rojek.eu>
> >
> > Yes, IIRC we were trying to figure out the range and settled with
> > [-3.3V,+3.3V] since it would give "plausible" values but which were
> > never quite right. The doc does say that the voltage is (hw_val /
> > 4096) * 1.2V, but also says that the ADC operated with 3.3V power
> > supply, I guess we got confused. We never considered the battery could
> > not be connected directly to the ADC's VBAT pin, so a 1.2V reference
> > didn't make sense at that time. I guess we need to learn about
> > electronics :)
> Yes we do :)
> >
> > It turns out the battery is connected to the VBAT pin with a 1 MOhm
> > resistor, and the VBAT pin is also pulled low with a 332 kOhm
> > resistor. So a fully charged battery with 4.2V reads as (4.2V *
> > 332000) / (1332000) = 1.05V, which totally fits in a [0V,+1.2V] range.
> >
> > With that same 4.2V battery I get a hardware value of about 3584, and
> > (3584 / 4096) * 1.2V == 1.05V, which matches the value computed above.
> > So the battery reading looks accurate this time.
> Excellent! Thanks for the detailed explanation.
Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> Cheers,
> Artur
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists