[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrW-hHyh3nF3ATmy61PCy1iFqVhVYX+-ptBCMP5Bf7aJ0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2020 11:07:44 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] Add generic user_landing tracking
On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 9:17 PM Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com> wrote:
>
> Started from discussion [1], where was noted that currently a couple of
> architectures support mremap() for vdso/sigpage, but not munmap().
> If an application maps something on the ex-place of vdso/sigpage,
> later after processing signal it will land there (good luck!)
>
> Patches set is based on linux-next (next-20201106) and it depends on
> changes in x86/cleanups (those reclaim TIF_IA32/TIF_X32) and also
> on my changes in akpm (fixing several mremap() issues).
>
> Logically, the patches set divides on:
> - patch 1: cleanup for patches in x86/cleanups
> - patches 2-11: cleanups for arch_setup_additional_pages()
I like these cleanups, although I think you should stop using terms
like "new-born". A task being exec'd is not newborn at all -- it's in
the middle of a transformation.
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists