[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201109142748.GI1257108@piout.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:27:48 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: Add pinctrl
driver for Microsemi Serial GPIO
On 09/11/2020 16:00:16+0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:07 PM Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 3:40 PM Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > >> +#define __shf(x) (__builtin_ffs(x) - 1)
> > >> +#define __BF_PREP(bf, x) (bf & ((x) << __shf(bf)))
> > >> +#define __BF_GET(bf, x) (((x & bf) >> __shf(bf)))
> > >
> > > Isn't it home grown reimplementation of bitfield.h?
> >
> > This was answered in the aforementioned mail.
>
> Perhaps it makes sense to add functions like field_get(), field_prep()
> to that header?
IIRC it has been explicitly excluded from bitfield.h to ensure
developers will think about the introduced overhead.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists