[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201109161050.GW2063125@dell>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 16:10:50 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/19] drm/radeon/radeon: Move prototype into shared
header
On Mon, 09 Nov 2020, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Lee,
> > >
> > > Other public functions in radeon_device.c have their prototype in
> > > radeon.h - for example radeon_is_px()
> > >
> > > Add radeon_device_is_virtual() there so we avoiid this new header.
> >
> > Oh yes, I remember why this wasn't a suitable solution now:
> >
> > The macro "radeon_init" in radeon.h clashes with the init function of
> > the same name in radeon_drv.c:
> >
> > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:53:
> > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:620:31: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before ‘void’
> > 620 | static int __init radeon_init(void)
> ...
> >
> > How would you like me to move forward?
>
> Fix the thousand of warnings in other places :-)
> I will take a look at radeon and post a new series based on your work
> with all W=1 warnings fixed.
I'll drop this patch and carry on ploughing through the rest of them.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists