[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e336c7e-207b-31fa-806e-c4e8028524a5@deltatee.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 09:47:11 -0700
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Ira Weiny <iweiny@...el.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/15] lib/scatterlist: Add flag for indicating P2PDMA
segments in an SGL
On 2020-11-09 2:12 a.m., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 10:00:25AM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> We make use of the top bit of the dma_length to indicate a P2PDMA
>> segment.
>
> I don't think "we" can. There is nothing limiting the size of a SGL
> segment.
Yes, I expected this would be the unacceptable part. Any alternative ideas?
Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists