[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201109170406.GC449970@google.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 09:04:06 -0800
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, ngupta@...are.org,
sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com, sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: include sparsemem.h for MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS
On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 02:16:37AM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 2020-11-08 01:56, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 16:22:06 +0100 Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch> wrote:
> >
> >> Most architectures define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS in asm/sparsemem.h and don't
> >> include it in asm/pgtable.h. Include asm/sparsemem.h directly to get
> >> the MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS define on all architectures.
> >>
> >> This fixes a crash when accessing zram on 32-bit ARM platform with LPAE and
> >> more than 4GB of memory:
> >> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
> >
> > Mysterious. Presumably without this include, some compilation unit is
> > picking up the wrong value of MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS? But I couldn't
> > actually see where/how this occurs. Can you please explain further?
>
> Not sure if I got that right, but from what I understand if
> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS is not set in mm/zsmalloc.c it will set
> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS to BITS_PER_LONG. And this is 32-bit, too short when
> LPAE is in use...
True. It's headache in the zsmalloc.
Somedays I'd really like to fix it via redesigning of metadata
management.
Thanks for the fixing the ancient bug, Stefan.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists