[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201109182206.3037326-13-lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 18:21:55 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: lee.jones@...aro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 12/23] mtd: ubi: wl: Fix a couple of kernel-doc issues
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c:584: warning: Function parameter or member 'nested' not described in 'schedule_erase'
drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c:1075: warning: Excess function parameter 'shutdown' description in '__erase_worker'
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
---
drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
index 7847de75a74ca..8455f1d47f3c9 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
@@ -575,6 +575,7 @@ static int erase_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wl_wrk,
* @vol_id: the volume ID that last used this PEB
* @lnum: the last used logical eraseblock number for the PEB
* @torture: if the physical eraseblock has to be tortured
+ * @nested: denotes whether the work_sem is already held in read mode
*
* This function returns zero in case of success and a %-ENOMEM in case of
* failure.
@@ -1063,8 +1064,6 @@ static int ensure_wear_leveling(struct ubi_device *ubi, int nested)
* __erase_worker - physical eraseblock erase worker function.
* @ubi: UBI device description object
* @wl_wrk: the work object
- * @shutdown: non-zero if the worker has to free memory and exit
- * because the WL sub-system is shutting down
*
* This function erases a physical eraseblock and perform torture testing if
* needed. It also takes care about marking the physical eraseblock bad if
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists