lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:23:48 +0100
From:   John Wood <john.wood@....com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc:     John Wood <john.wood@....com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] Documentation: Add documentation for the Brute LSM

Hi,
Thanks for the typos corrections. Will be corrected in the next patch
version.

On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 08:31:13PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> So an app could read crash_period_threshold and just do a new fork every
> threshold + 1 time units, right? and not be caught?

Yes, you are right. But we must set a crash_period_threshold that does not
make an attack feasible. For example, with the default value of 30000 ms,
an attacker can break the app only once every 30 seconds. So, to guess
canaries or break ASLR, the attack needs a big amount of time. But it is
possible.

So, I think that to avoid this scenario we can add a maximum number of
faults per fork hierarchy. Then, the mitigation will be triggered if the
application crash period falls under the period threshold or if the number
of faults exceed the maximum commented.

This way, if an attack is of long duration, it will also be detected and
mitigated.

What do you think?

>
> thanks for the documentation.
> --
> ~Randy
>

Thanks,
John Wood

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ