linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] lib: zstd: Add zstd compatibility wrapper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 09 Nov 2020 14:01:41 -0500
From:   "Chris Mason" <clm@...com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:     Nick Terrell <nickrterrell@...il.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        <squashfs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
        Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>, Petr Malat <oss@...at.biz>,
        Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...com>,
        Niket Agarwal <niketa@...com>, Yann Collet <cyan@...com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] lib: zstd: Add zstd compatibility wrapper

On 6 Nov 2020, at 13:38, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> You just keep resedning this crap, don't you?  Haven't you been told
> multiple times to provide a proper kernel API by now?

You do consistently ask for a shim layer, but you haven’t explained 
what we gain by diverging from the documented and tested API of the 
upstream zstd project.  It’s an important discussion given that we 
hope to regularly update the kernel side as they make improvements in 
zstd.

The only benefit described so far seems to be camelcase related, but if 
there are problems in the API beyond that, I haven’t seen you describe 
them.  I don’t think the camelcase alone justifies the added costs of 
the shim.

-chris