lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACSApvaG7uJDeoaPdSuLAoEgZK2YQHRn34hBQyk4y+5uH86cMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Nov 2020 14:28:40 -0500
From:   Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>,
        Guantao Liu <guantaol@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] simplify ep_poll

On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:22 PM Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2020, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh wrote:
> >FWIW, I also stress-tested the patch series applied on top of
> >linux-next/master for a couple of hours.
>
> Out of curiosity, what exactly did you use for testing?

That's a good question. I ran two flavors of tests:
- The epoll_wakeup_test selftest in a tight loop on two different
CPUs. This includes the newly added epoll61 test case for the timeout
race.
- Internal production loadtests (i.e., multi-node benchmarks).

Thanks,
Soheil

> Thanks,
> Davidlohr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ