lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <160495129749.49337.12919860085282006110.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 09 Nov 2020 19:48:28 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: bcm63xx-hsspi: fix missing clk_disable_unprepare() on error in bcm63xx_hsspi_resume

On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 15:49:11 +0800, Qinglang Miao wrote:
> Fix the missing clk_disable_unprepare() before return
> from bcm63xx_hsspi_resume in the error handling case when
> fails to prepare and enable bs->pll_clk.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: bcm63xx-hsspi: fix missing clk_disable_unprepare() on error in bcm63xx_hsspi_resume
      commit: 9bb9ef2b3e5d9d012876e7e2d7757eb30e865bee

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ