[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5fa9b0f5eb2f6_8c0e20854@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 13:13:25 -0800
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] bpf: remove duplicate include
Wang Qing wrote:
> Remove duplicate header which is included twice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/btf.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index ed7d02e..6324de8
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
> #include <linux/skmsg.h>
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> #include <linux/bsearch.h>
> -#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
> #include <net/sock.h>
>
> /* BTF (BPF Type Format) is the meta data format which describes
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Looks fine to me. But, these types of things should go to bpf-next I
see no reason to push these into bpf tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists