[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21d84c20-ac34-7d05-3c7d-feb1a881980d@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 10:22:31 +0100
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: chanwoo@...nel.org, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: passive: Update frequency when start
governor
Hi Chanwoo,
On 03.11.2020 08:06, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> If the parent device changes the their frequency before registering
> the passive device, the passive device cannot receive the notification
> from parent device and then the passive device cannot be able to
> set the proper frequency according to the frequency of parent device.
>
> So, when start the passive governor, update the frequency
> according to the frequency of parent device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
This patch landed in linux next-20201109 as commit 9b38a4f6b664 ("PM /
devfreq: passive: Update frequency when start governor"). Sadly it
causes the following warning on various Exynos boards with default
exynos_defconfig build:
exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus_dmc ( 50000 KHz ~ 400000 KHz)
exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus_leftbus ( 50000 KHz ~
200000 KHz)
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 22 at drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c:411
devfreq_update_target+0xdc/0xec
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 22 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.10.0-rc2-next-20201109 #1898
Hardware name: Samsung Exynos (Flattened Device Tree)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
[<c0111648>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010d000>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c010d000>] (show_stack) from [<c0b224a0>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xd4)
[<c0b224a0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0126844>] (__warn+0xd8/0x11c)
[<c0126844>] (__warn) from [<c0126938>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0xb0/0xb8)
[<c0126938>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c08ae39c>]
(devfreq_update_target+0xdc/0xec)
[<c08ae39c>] (devfreq_update_target) from [<c08afa0c>]
(devfreq_passive_event_handler+0x80/0xc4)
[<c08afa0c>] (devfreq_passive_event_handler) from [<c08ade70>]
(devfreq_add_device+0x4f8/0x5a0)
[<c08ade70>] (devfreq_add_device) from [<c08adf60>]
(devm_devfreq_add_device+0x48/0x84)
[<c08adf60>] (devm_devfreq_add_device) from [<c08b01c8>]
(exynos_bus_probe+0x2ac/0x5c8)
[<c08b01c8>] (exynos_bus_probe) from [<c0692a70>]
(platform_drv_probe+0x6c/0xa4)
[<c0692a70>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c0690020>]
(really_probe+0x200/0x4fc)
[<c0690020>] (really_probe) from [<c06904e4>]
(driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1fc)
[<c06904e4>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c068de7c>]
(bus_for_each_drv+0x74/0xb8)
[<c068de7c>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c068fd80>]
(__device_attach+0xe4/0x17c)
[<c068fd80>] (__device_attach) from [<c068ee40>]
(bus_probe_device+0x88/0x90)
[<c068ee40>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c068f358>]
(deferred_probe_work_func+0x3c/0xd0)
[<c068f358>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c0148a70>]
(process_one_work+0x234/0x7e4)
[<c0148a70>] (process_one_work) from [<c0149064>] (worker_thread+0x44/0x51c)
[<c0149064>] (worker_thread) from [<c014fdc8>] (kthread+0x158/0x1a0)
[<c014fdc8>] (kthread) from [<c010011c>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x38)
Exception stack(0xc1e27fb0 to 0xc1e27ff8)
7fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000
00000000
7fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
00000000
7fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
irq event stamp: 12147
hardirqs last enabled at (12171): [<c01a0358>] console_unlock+0x430/0x6b0
dwc2 12480000.hsotg: new device is high-speed
hardirqs last disabled at (12176): [<c01a0350>] console_unlock+0x428/0x6b0
softirqs last enabled at (12168): [<c01017a8>] __do_softirq+0x528/0x674
softirqs last disabled at (12155): [<c012fdb0>] irq_exit+0x1dc/0x1e8
---[ end trace 89c1007ec29b9250 ]---
Reverting it on top of the linux-next fixes the warning, but I assume
that the proper fix would require locking changes during the devfreq
registration.
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
> index 63332e4a65ae..375aa636027c 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,21 @@ static int devfreq_passive_event_handler(struct devfreq *devfreq,
> if (!p_data->this)
> p_data->this = devfreq;
>
> + /*
> + * If the parent device changes the their frequency before
> + * registering the passive device, the passive device cannot
> + * receive the notification from parent device and then the
> + * passive device cannot be able to set the proper frequency
> + * according to the frequency of parent device.
> + *
> + * When start the passive governor, update the frequency
> + * according to the frequency of parent device.
> + */
> + ret = devfreq_update_target(devfreq, parent->previous_freq);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_warn(&devfreq->dev,
> + "failed to update devfreq using passive governor\n");
> +
> nb->notifier_call = devfreq_passive_notifier_call;
> ret = devfreq_register_notifier(parent, nb,
> DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Powered by blists - more mailing lists