linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/25] Make charlcd device independent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72nrXMoab=c0KvcA6fgn=sRuVsR6Kgx6iCW=XEFx=gnkVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Nov 2020 10:53:31 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Lars Poeschel <poeschel@...onage.de>,
        Willy Tarreau <willy@...roxy.com>,
        Ksenija Stanojevic <ksenija.stanojevic@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/25] Make charlcd device independent

Hi Randy,

On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 5:35 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure that I understand the question...
>
> Include
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> if possible. If not, then don't. It's not a big deal.
>
> Integrate the fix from Lars in whatever way works for you.

Thanks Randy -- I asked Stephen Rothwell and he told me even for -next
patches on top are preferred, unless the bug is bad enough. In which
case, the [] notation can still be used to give credit.

Cheers,
Miguel