linux-kernel - [PATCH] net: sunrpc: xprtsock.c: Corrected few spellings ,in comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201109095404.25154-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon,  9 Nov 2020 15:24:05 +0530
From:   Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To:     bfields@...ldses.org, chuck.lever@...cle.com,
        trond.myklebust@...merspace.com, anna.schumaker@...app.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: sunrpc: xprtsock.c: Corrected few spellings ,in comments

Few trivial and rudimentary spell corrections.

Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
---
 net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
index 343c6396b297..90792afea6c8 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ xs_stream_record_marker(struct xdr_buf *xdr)
  *   EAGAIN:	The socket was blocked, please call again later to
  *		complete the request
  * ENOTCONN:	Caller needs to invoke connect logic then call again
- *    other:	Some other error occured, the request was not sent
+ *    other:	Some other error occurred, the request was not sent
  */
 static int xs_local_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req)
 {
@@ -1664,7 +1664,7 @@ static int xs_bind(struct sock_xprt *transport, struct socket *sock)
 	 * This ensures that we can continue to establish TCP
 	 * connections even when all local ephemeral ports are already
 	 * a part of some TCP connection.  This makes no difference
-	 * for UDP sockets, but also doens't harm them.
+	 * for UDP sockets, but also doesn't harm them.
 	 *
 	 * If we're asking for any reserved port (i.e. port == 0 &&
 	 * transport->xprt.resvport == 1) xs_get_srcport above will
@@ -2380,7 +2380,7 @@ static void xs_error_handle(struct work_struct *work)
 }

 /**
- * xs_local_print_stats - display AF_LOCAL socket-specifc stats
+ * xs_local_print_stats - display AF_LOCAL socket-specific stats
  * @xprt: rpc_xprt struct containing statistics
  * @seq: output file
  *
@@ -2409,7 +2409,7 @@ static void xs_local_print_stats(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct seq_file *seq)
 }

 /**
- * xs_udp_print_stats - display UDP socket-specifc stats
+ * xs_udp_print_stats - display UDP socket-specific stats
  * @xprt: rpc_xprt struct containing statistics
  * @seq: output file
  *
@@ -2433,7 +2433,7 @@ static void xs_udp_print_stats(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct seq_file *seq)
 }

 /**
- * xs_tcp_print_stats - display TCP socket-specifc stats
+ * xs_tcp_print_stats - display TCP socket-specific stats
  * @xprt: rpc_xprt struct containing statistics
  * @seq: output file
  *
--
2.26.2