linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] vt: keyboard, use GENMAASK()/BIT() macros instead of open coded variants

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201109105449.GX4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Nov 2020 12:54:49 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc:     David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] vt: keyboard, use GENMAASK()/BIT() macros instead
 of open coded variants

On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 11:41:31AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 09. 11. 20, 11:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 12:10:27PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 11:57 AM Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > On 06. 11. 20, 17:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > > sorry,
> > > 
> > > Consider this then as RFC.
> > > What about the rest of the series?
> > 
> > I got the answer, thanks!
> > So, I will drop the first patch and resend the rest with your Ack.
> 
> As I wrote the BIT pieces are mostly fine too…

Okay, I will try again with BIT() conversion only.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko