linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 83/85] xfs: flush for older, xfs specific ioctls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201109125026.570966436@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  9 Nov 2020 13:56:20 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Strohman <astroh@...zon.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 83/85] xfs: flush for older, xfs specific ioctls

From: Andy Strohman <astroh@...zon.com>

837a6e7f5cdb ("fs: add generic UNRESVSP and ZERO_RANGE ioctl handlers") changed
ioctls XFS_IOC_UNRESVSP XFS_IOC_UNRESVSP64 and XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE to be generic
instead of xfs specific.

Because of this change, 36f11775da75 ("xfs: properly serialise fallocate against
AIO+DIO") needed adaptation, as 5.4 still uses the xfs specific ioctls.

Without this, xfstests xfs/242 and xfs/290 fail. Both of these tests test
XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE.

Fixes: 36f11775da75 ("xfs: properly serialise fallocate against AIO+DIO")
Tested-by: Andy Strohman <astroh@...zon.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
@@ -622,7 +622,6 @@ xfs_ioc_space(
 	error = xfs_break_layouts(inode, &iolock, BREAK_UNMAP);
 	if (error)
 		goto out_unlock;
-	inode_dio_wait(inode);
 
 	switch (bf->l_whence) {
 	case 0: /*SEEK_SET*/
@@ -668,6 +667,31 @@ xfs_ioc_space(
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Must wait for all AIO to complete before we continue as AIO can
+	 * change the file size on completion without holding any locks we
+	 * currently hold. We must do this first because AIO can update both
+	 * the on disk and in memory inode sizes, and the operations that follow
+	 * require the in-memory size to be fully up-to-date.
+	 */
+	inode_dio_wait(inode);
+
+	/*
+	 * Now that AIO and DIO has drained we can flush and (if necessary)
+	 * invalidate the cached range over the first operation we are about to
+	 * run. We include zero range here because it starts with a hole punch
+	 * over the target range.
+	 */
+	switch (cmd) {
+	case XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE:
+	case XFS_IOC_UNRESVSP:
+	case XFS_IOC_UNRESVSP64:
+		error = xfs_flush_unmap_range(ip, bf->l_start, bf->l_len);
+		if (error)
+			goto out_unlock;
+		break;
+	}
+
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE:
 		flags |= XFS_PREALLOC_SET;