[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201109125033.272440345@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 13:55:15 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@...wei.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Feilong Lin <linfeilong@...wei.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.9 053/133] mm: mempolicy: fix potential pte_unmap_unlock pte error
From: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@...wei.com>
commit 3f08842098e842c51e3b97d0dcdebf810b32558e upstream.
When flags in queue_pages_pte_range don't have MPOL_MF_MOVE or
MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL bits, code breaks and passing origin pte - 1 to
pte_unmap_unlock seems like not a good idea.
queue_pages_pte_range can run in MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL mode which doesn't
migrate misplaced pages but returns with EIO when encountering such a
page. Since commit a7f40cfe3b7a ("mm: mempolicy: make mbind() return
-EIO when MPOL_MF_STRICT is specified") and early break on the first pte
in the range results in pte_unmap_unlock on an underflow pte. This can
lead to lockups later on when somebody tries to lock the pte resp.
page_table_lock again..
Fixes: a7f40cfe3b7a ("mm: mempolicy: make mbind() return -EIO when MPOL_MF_STRICT is specified")
Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@...wei.com>
Cc: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@...wei.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201019074853.50856-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static int queue_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *
unsigned long flags = qp->flags;
int ret;
bool has_unmovable = false;
- pte_t *pte;
+ pte_t *pte, *mapped_pte;
spinlock_t *ptl;
ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ static int queue_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *
if (pmd_trans_unstable(pmd))
return 0;
- pte = pte_offset_map_lock(walk->mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
+ mapped_pte = pte = pte_offset_map_lock(walk->mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
if (!pte_present(*pte))
continue;
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ static int queue_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *
} else
break;
}
- pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl);
+ pte_unmap_unlock(mapped_pte, ptl);
cond_resched();
if (has_unmovable)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists