| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 13:55:49 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.9 087/133] btrfs: drop the path before adding qgroup items when enabling qgroups
From: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
[ Upstream commit 5223cc60b40ae525ae6c94e98824129f1a5b4ae5 ]
When enabling qgroups we walk the tree_root and then add a qgroup item
for every root that we have. This creates a lock dependency on the
tree_root and qgroup_root, which results in the following lockdep splat
(with tree locks using rwsem), eg. in tests btrfs/017 or btrfs/022:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.9.0-default+ #1299 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
btrfs/24552 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff9142dfc5f630 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
but task is already holding lock:
ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730
lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130
down_read_nested+0x46/0x130
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_insert_item+0x6e/0x140 [btrfs]
btrfs_create_tree+0x1cb/0x240 [btrfs]
btrfs_quota_enable+0xcd/0x790 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30
validate_chain+0x491/0x750
__lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730
lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130
down_read_nested+0x46/0x130
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs]
add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs]
btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(btrfs-quota-00);
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(btrfs-quota-00);
*** DEADLOCK ***
5 locks held by btrfs/24552:
#0: ffff9142df431478 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0xa0
#1: ffff9142f9b10cc0 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0x7b/0xe0 [btrfs]
#2: ffff9142f9b11a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0x790 [btrfs]
#3: ffff9142df431698 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x406/0x510 [btrfs]
#4: ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 24552 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1299
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x77/0x97
check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110
check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30
validate_chain+0x491/0x750
__lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730
lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130
? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
? lock_acquire+0xc4/0x140
? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
down_read_nested+0x46/0x130
? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
? btrfs_root_node+0xd9/0x200 [btrfs]
__btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs]
add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs]
btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Fix this by dropping the path whenever we find a root item, add the
qgroup item, and then re-lookup the root item we found and continue
processing roots.
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
index c0f350c3a0cf4..db953cb947bc4 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
@@ -1026,6 +1026,10 @@ int btrfs_quota_enable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &found_key, slot);
if (found_key.type == BTRFS_ROOT_REF_KEY) {
+
+ /* Release locks on tree_root before we access quota_root */
+ btrfs_release_path(path);
+
ret = add_qgroup_item(trans, quota_root,
found_key.offset);
if (ret) {
@@ -1044,6 +1048,20 @@ int btrfs_quota_enable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
goto out_free_path;
}
+ ret = btrfs_search_slot_for_read(tree_root, &found_key,
+ path, 1, 0);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
+ goto out_free_path;
+ }
+ if (ret > 0) {
+ /*
+ * Shouldn't happen, but in case it does we
+ * don't need to do the btrfs_next_item, just
+ * continue.
+ */
+ continue;
+ }
}
ret = btrfs_next_item(tree_root, path);
if (ret < 0) {
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists