[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201110154025.158617782@goodmis.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:38:55 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>,
stable-rt@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RT 2/5] mm/memcontrol: Disable preemption in __mod_memcg_lruvec_state()
5.4.74-rt42-rc2 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
The callers expect disabled preemption/interrupts while invoking
__mod_memcg_lruvec_state(). This works mainline because a lock of
somekind is acquired.
Use preempt_disable_rt() where per-CPU variables are accessed and a
stable pointer is expected. This is also done in __mod_zone_page_state()
for the same reason.
Cc: stable-rt@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 9bdb75ef6d62..c9d02e2272e1 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -752,6 +752,7 @@ void __mod_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum node_stat_item idx,
pn = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_node, lruvec);
memcg = pn->memcg;
+ preempt_disable_rt();
/* Update memcg */
__mod_memcg_state(memcg, idx, val);
@@ -767,6 +768,7 @@ void __mod_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum node_stat_item idx,
x = 0;
}
__this_cpu_write(pn->lruvec_stat_cpu->count[idx], x);
+ preempt_enable_rt();
}
void __mod_lruvec_slab_state(void *p, enum node_stat_item idx, int val)
--
2.28.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists