[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALprXBZKnJGzFCLp0=UxJQp423QuaiPiaPzyY3-662k1gHUk-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:07:54 +0800
From: Ajye Huang <ajye_huang@...pal.corp-partner.google.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Ajye Huang <ajye.huang@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rohit kumar <rohitkr@...eaurora.org>,
Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
Patrick Lai <plai@...eaurora.org>,
Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@...eaurora.org>,
Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Cheng-yi Chiang <cychiang@...omium.org>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
ALSA development <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Modify documentation and machine driver for SC7180
sound card
Hi,Mark
Thank you, I already understand, sorry for causing you trouble.
Ajye
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:56 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 05:40:40PM +0800, Ajye Huang wrote:
> > Hi, Mark
> >
> > Could you please kindly review the series patch v6? And may I get your
> > approval if the review is done.
>
> Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
> on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
> please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been
> review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
>
> Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
> all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
> directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> for the subsystem are normally handled.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists