[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201110165015.GM2594@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:50:15 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, valentin.schneider@....com,
morten.rasmussen@....com, ouwen210@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/fair: prefer prev cpu in asymmetric wakeup path
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 05:18:24PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> During fast wakeup path, scheduler always check whether local or prev cpus
> are good candidates for the task before looking for other cpus in the
> domain. With
> commit b7a331615d25 ("sched/fair: Add asymmetric CPU capacity wakeup scan")
> the heterogenous system gains a dedicated path but doesn't try to reuse
> prev cpu whenever possible. If the previous cpu is idle and belong to the
> LLC domain, we should check it 1st before looking for another cpu because
> it stays one of the best candidate and this also stabilizes task placement
> on the system.
>
> This change aligns asymmetric path behavior with symmetric one and reduces
> cases where the task migrates across all cpus of the sd_asym_cpucapacity
> domains at wakeup.
>
> This change does not impact normal EAS mode but only the overloaded case or
> when EAS is not used.
>
> - On hikey960 with performance governor (EAS disable)
>
> ./perf bench sched pipe -T -l 50000
> mainline w/ patch
> # migrations 999364 0
> ops/sec 149313(+/-0.28%) 182587(+/- 0.40) +22%
>
> - On hikey with performance governor
>
> ./perf bench sched pipe -T -l 50000
> mainline w/ patch
> # migrations 0 0
> ops/sec 47721(+/-0.76%) 47899(+/- 0.56) +0.4%
>
> According to test on hikey, the patch doesn't impact symmetric system
> compared to current implementation (only tested on arm64)
>
> Also read the uclamped value of task's utilization at most twice instead
> instead each time we compare task's utilization with cpu's capacity.
>
> Fixes: b7a331615d25 ("sched/fair: Add asymmetric CPU capacity wakeup scan")
> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> ---
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists