[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201110174606.mp5m33lgqksks4mt@treble>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:46:06 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:29:24PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 03:11:41PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > CONFIG_XEN
> >
> > __switch_to_asm()+0x0: undefined stack state
> > xen_hypercall_set_trap_table()+0x0: <=== (sym)
With your branch + GCC 9 I can recreate all the warnings except this
one.
Will do some digging on the others...
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists