linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] firmware: QCOM_SCM: Allow qcom_scm driver to be loadable as a permenent module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:51:46 -0800
From:   John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>,
        Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
        Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] firmware: QCOM_SCM: Allow qcom_scm driver to be
 loadable as a permenent module

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 5:35 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 5:27 AM John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > Allow the qcom_scm driver to be loadable as a permenent module.
> >
...
> I applied this patch to the pinctrl tree as well, I suppose
> that was the intention. If someone gets upset I can always
> pull it out.

Will: You ok with this?

thanks
-john