linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/24] perf: Add build id data in mmap2 event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201110185506.GB26034@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 15:55:06 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/24] perf: Add build id data in mmap2 event

Em Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 07:23:34PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:10:46AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 09:28:51AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 10:53:54PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > There's new misc bit for mmap2 to signal there's build
> > > > id data in it:
> > > > 
> > > >   #define PERF_RECORD_MISC_BUILD_ID              (1 << 14)
> > > 
> > > PERF_RECORD_MISC_MMAP_BUILD_ID would be consistent with the existing
> > > PERF_RECORD_MISC_MMAP_DATA naming.

Agreed.

> > ok
 
> > > 
> > > Also, AFAICT there's still a bunch of unused bits in misc.
> > > 
> > > 	012	    CDEF
> > > 	|||---------||||
> > > 
> > > Where:
> > > 	0-2	CPUMODE_MASK
> > > 
> > > 	C	PROC_MAP_PARSE_TIMEOUT
> > > 	D	MMAP_DATA / COMM_EXEC / FORK_EXEC / SWITCH_OUT
> > > 	E	EXACT_IP / SCHED_OUT_PREEMPT
> > > 	F	(reserved)
> > > 
> > > Maybe we should put in a comment to keep track of the hole ?
> > 
> > ook
> 
> how about the change below.. I also switch the build_id with the size,
> but I kept the build_id size 20, because I think there's bigger chance
> we will use those reserved bytes for something, than that we will need
> those extra 3 bytes in build_id array
> 
>   struct {
>           u8              build_id_size;
>           u8              __reserved_1;
>           u16             __reserved_2;
>           u8              build_id[20];
>   };

For "maybe we'll use it for something else" doesn't require that it gets
before build_id, i.e. to use it for something else it can be as above or

   struct {
           u8              build_id_size;
           u8              build_id[20];
           u8              __reserved_1;
           u16             __reserved_2;
   };

that groups build_id size with it, but nah, this is getting funny by
now.

My suggestion was not about increasing build_id to 23, just to leave the
unused (reserved) bytes after it.

- Arnaldo