[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201110190635.GE850433@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 14:06:35 -0500
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
tj@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com, khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru,
daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com, willy@...radead.org, lkp@...el.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, shakeelb@...gle.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, richard.weiyang@...il.com,
kirill@...temov.name, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
rong.a.chen@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
shy828301@...il.com, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 06/19] mm/rmap: stop store reordering issue on
page->mapping
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 09:20:04AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> From 2fd278b1ca6c3e260ad249808b62f671d8db5a7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:38:24 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH v21 06/19] mm/rmap: stop store reordering issue on
> page->mapping
>
> Hugh Dickins and Minchan Kim observed a long time issue which
> discussed here, but actully the mentioned fix missed.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20150504031722.GA2768@blaptop/
> The store reordering may cause problem in the scenario:
>
> CPU 0 CPU1
> do_anonymous_page
> page_add_new_anon_rmap()
> page->mapping = anon_vma + PAGE_MAPPING_ANON
> lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()
> spin_lock(lruvec->lock)
> SetPageLRU()
> spin_unlock(lruvec->lock)
> /* idletacking judged it as LRU
> * page so pass the page in
> * page_idle_clear_pte_refs
> */
> page_idle_clear_pte_refs
> rmap_walk
> if PageAnon(page)
>
> Johannes give detailed examples how the store reordering could cause
> a trouble:
> "The concern is the SetPageLRU may get reorder before 'page->mapping'
> setting, That would make CPU 1 will observe at page->mapping after
> observing PageLRU set on the page.
>
> 1. anon_vma + PAGE_MAPPING_ANON
>
> That's the in-order scenario and is fine.
>
> 2. NULL
>
> That's possible if the page->mapping store gets reordered to occur
> after SetPageLRU. That's fine too because we check for it.
>
> 3. anon_vma without the PAGE_MAPPING_ANON bit
>
> That would be a problem and could lead to all kinds of undesirable
> behavior including crashes and data corruption.
>
> Is it possible? AFAICT the compiler is allowed to tear the store to
> page->mapping and I don't see anything that would prevent it.
>
> That said, I also don't see how the reader testing PageLRU under the
> lru_lock would prevent that in the first place. AFAICT we need that
> WRITE_ONCE() around the page->mapping assignment."
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Thanks Alex!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists