linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] security: add fault injection to LSM hooks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 14:14:55 +1100 (AEDT)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:     Aleksandr Nogikh <aleksandrnogikh@...il.com>
cc:     serge@...lyn.com, akinobu.mita@...il.com,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>, mortonm@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] security: add fault injection to LSM hooks

On Mon, 9 Nov 2020, Aleksandr Nogikh wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 21:35, Aleksandr Nogikh
> <aleksandrnogikh@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>
> >
> > Fault injection capabilities[Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.rst]
> > facilitate testing of the stability of the Linux kernel by providing
> > means to force a number of kernel interfaces to return error
> > codes. This patch series proposes adding such fault injection
> > capability into LSM hooks.
> >
> > The intent is to make it possible to test whether the existing kernel
> > code properly handles negative return values of LSM hooks. Syzbot
> > [https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/syzbot.md] will
> > automatically do that with the aid of instrumentation tools once these
> > changes are merged.
> > [...]
> 
> What tree should these changes go to?
> 

Mine, but more signoffs/acks are required.

> Is there anyone else who is not on the recipient list but still might
> be interested in the series?
> 

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>