[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <afefc59cff147c1e85196447d349df5a8b3000b0.1605027593.git.skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:53:31 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org,
keescook@...omium.org, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/13] drivers/base/test/test_async_driver_probe: convert to use seqnum_ops
seqnum_ops api is introduced to be used when a variable is used as
a sequence/stat counter and doesn't guard object lifetimes. This
clearly differentiates atomic_t usages that guard object lifetimes.
seqnum32 variables wrap around to INT_MIN when it overflows and
should not be used to guard resource lifetimes, device usage and
open counts that control state changes, and pm states.
atomic_t variables used to count errors, warns, keep track of timeout,
and async completion are counters.
Unsure overflow is a concern for timeout and async completion, and there
are no checks for overflow to hold them to upper bounds. Overflow and
wrap around doesn't impact errors, and warns.
Convert them to use seqnum32 and init counters to 0. This conversion
doesn't change the overflow wrap around behavior.
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/base/test/test_async_driver_probe.c | 26 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/test/test_async_driver_probe.c b/drivers/base/test/test_async_driver_probe.c
index 3bb7beb127a9..1886f79ec252 100644
--- a/drivers/base/test/test_async_driver_probe.c
+++ b/drivers/base/test/test_async_driver_probe.c
@@ -14,11 +14,15 @@
#include <linux/numa.h>
#include <linux/nodemask.h>
#include <linux/topology.h>
+#include <linux/seqnum_ops.h>
#define TEST_PROBE_DELAY (5 * 1000) /* 5 sec */
#define TEST_PROBE_THRESHOLD (TEST_PROBE_DELAY / 2)
-static atomic_t warnings, errors, timeout, async_completed;
+static struct seqnum32 warnings = SEQNUM_INIT(0);
+static struct seqnum32 errors = SEQNUM_INIT(0);
+static struct seqnum32 timeout = SEQNUM_INIT(0);
+static struct seqnum32 async_completed = SEQNUM_INIT(0);
static int test_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
@@ -29,9 +33,9 @@ static int test_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* have then report it as an error, otherwise we wil sleep for the
* required amount of time and then report completion.
*/
- if (atomic_read(&timeout)) {
+ if (seqnum32_read(&timeout)) {
dev_err(dev, "async probe took too long\n");
- atomic_inc(&errors);
+ seqnum32_inc(&errors);
} else {
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "sleeping for %d msecs in probe\n",
TEST_PROBE_DELAY);
@@ -48,10 +52,10 @@ static int test_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_to_node(dev) != numa_node_id()) {
dev_warn(dev, "NUMA node mismatch %d != %d\n",
dev_to_node(dev), numa_node_id());
- atomic_inc(&warnings);
+ seqnum32_inc(&warnings);
}
- atomic_inc(&async_completed);
+ seqnum32_inc(&async_completed);
}
return 0;
@@ -244,11 +248,12 @@ static int __init test_async_probe_init(void)
* Otherwise if they completed without errors or warnings then
* report successful completion.
*/
- if (atomic_read(&async_completed) != async_id) {
+ if (seqnum32_read(&async_completed) != async_id) {
pr_err("async events still pending, forcing timeout\n");
- atomic_inc(&timeout);
+ seqnum32_inc(&timeout);
err = -ETIMEDOUT;
- } else if (!atomic_read(&errors) && !atomic_read(&warnings)) {
+ } else if (!seqnum32_read(&errors) &&
+ !seqnum32_read(&warnings)) {
pr_info("completed successfully\n");
return 0;
}
@@ -271,12 +276,13 @@ static int __init test_async_probe_init(void)
* errors or warnings being reported by the probe routine.
*/
if (err)
- atomic_inc(&errors);
+ seqnum32_inc(&errors);
else
err = -EINVAL;
pr_err("Test failed with %d errors and %d warnings\n",
- atomic_read(&errors), atomic_read(&warnings));
+ seqnum32_read(&errors),
+ seqnum32_read(&warnings));
return err;
}
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists