linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 18/30] pwm: tegra: Support OPP and core voltage scaling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201110205057.GH2375022@ulmo>
Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:50:57 +0100
From:   Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Peter Chen <Peter.Chen@....com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 18/30] pwm: tegra: Support OPP and core voltage scaling

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:44:15AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
[...]
> +static void tegra_pwm_deinit_opp_table(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = data;
> +	struct opp_table *opp_table;
> +
> +	opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
> +	dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
> +	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(opp_table);
> +	dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(opp_table);
> +}
> +
> +static int devm_tegra_pwm_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct opp_table *opp_table;
> +	const char *rname = "core";
> +	int err;
> +
> +	/* voltage scaling is optional */
> +	if (device_property_present(dev, "core-supply"))
> +		opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(dev, &rname, 1);
> +	else
> +		opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(opp_table))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(opp_table),
> +				     "failed to prepare OPP table\n");
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * OPP table presence is optional and we want the set_rate() of OPP
> +	 * API to work similarly to clk_set_rate() if table is missing in a
> +	 * device-tree.  The add_table() errors out if OPP is missing in DT.
> +	 */
> +	if (device_property_present(dev, "operating-points-v2")) {
> +		err = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev);
> +		if (err) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to add OPP table: %d\n", err);
> +			goto put_table;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	err = devm_add_action(dev, tegra_pwm_deinit_opp_table, dev);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto remove_table;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +remove_table:
> +	dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
> +put_table:
> +	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(opp_table);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}

These two functions seem to be heavily boilerplate across all these
drivers. Have you considered splitting these out into separate helpers?

Thierry

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)