[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201110213511.GW3576660@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:35:11 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] seq_file: add seq_read_iter
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 09:32:53PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> AFAICS, not all callers want that semantics, but I think it's worth
> a new primitive. I'm not saying it should be a prereq for your
> series, but either that or an explicit iov_iter_revert() is needed.
Seeing that it already went into mainline, it needs a followup fix.
And since it's not -stable fodder (AFAICS), I'd rather go with
adding a new primitive...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists