[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201110221048.3411288-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 22:10:48 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][V2] PCI: Fix a potential uninitentional integer overflow issue
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The shift of 1 by align_order is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic
and the result is assigned to a resource_size_t type variable that
is a 64 bit unsigned integer on 64 bit platforms. Fix an overflow
before widening issue by making the 1 a ULL.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: 07d8d7e57c28 ("PCI: Make specifying PCI devices in kernel parameters reusable")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
V2: Use ULL instead of BIT_ULL(), fix spelling mistake and capitalize first
word of patch subject.
---
drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 3ef63a101fa1..248044a7ef8c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -6214,7 +6214,7 @@ static resource_size_t pci_specified_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev,
if (align_order == -1)
align = PAGE_SIZE;
else
- align = 1 << align_order;
+ align = 1ULL << align_order;
break;
} else if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("PCI: Can't parse resource_alignment parameter: %s\n",
--
2.28.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists