linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 03/15] PCI/P2PDMA: Introduce pci_p2pdma_should_map_bus() and pci_p2pdma_bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201110232513.GA705726@bjorn-Precision-5520>
Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:25:13 -0600
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Ira Weiny <iweiny@...el.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/15] PCI/P2PDMA: Introduce
 pci_p2pdma_should_map_bus() and pci_p2pdma_bus_offset()

On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 10:00:24AM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Introduce pci_p2pdma_should_map_bus() which is meant to be called by
> dma map functions to determine how to map a given p2pdma page.

s/dma/DMA/ for consistency (also below in function comment)

> pci_p2pdma_bus_offset() is also added to allow callers to get the bus
> offset if they need to map the bus address.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/p2pdma.c       | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/pci-p2pdma.h | 11 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> index ea8472278b11..9961e779f430 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> @@ -930,6 +930,52 @@ void pci_p2pdma_unmap_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_p2pdma_unmap_sg_attrs);
>  
> +/**
> + * pci_p2pdma_bus_offset - returns the bus offset for a given page
> + * @page: page to get the offset for
> + *
> + * Must be passed a pci p2pdma page.

s/pci/PCI/

> + */
> +u64 pci_p2pdma_bus_offset(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	struct pci_p2pdma_pagemap *p2p_pgmap = to_p2p_pgmap(page->pgmap);
> +
> +	WARN_ON(!is_pci_p2pdma_page(page));
> +
> +	return p2p_pgmap->bus_offset;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_p2pdma_bus_offset);
> +
> +/**
> + * pci_p2pdma_should_map_bus - determine if a dma mapping should use the
> + *	bus address
> + * @dev: device doing the DMA request
> + * @pgmap: dev_pagemap structure for the mapping
> + *
> + * Returns 1 if the page should be mapped with a bus address, 0 otherwise
> + * and -1 the device should not be mapping P2PDMA pages.

I think this is missing a word.

I'm not really sure how to interpret the "should" in
pci_p2pdma_should_map_bus().  If this returns -1, does that mean the
patches *cannot* be mapped?  They *could* be mapped, but you really
*shouldn't*?  Something else?

1 means page should be mapped with bus address.  0 means ... what,
exactly?  It should be mapped with some different address?

Sorry these are naive questions because I don't know how all this
works.

> + */
> +int pci_p2pdma_should_map_bus(struct device *dev, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
> +{
> +	struct pci_p2pdma_pagemap *p2p_pgmap = to_p2p_pgmap(pgmap);
> +	struct pci_dev *client;
> +
> +	if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	client = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> +	switch (pci_p2pdma_map_type(p2p_pgmap->provider, client)) {
> +	case PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_THRU_HOST_BRIDGE:
> +		return 0;
> +	case PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_BUS_ADDR:
> +		return 1;
> +	default:
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_p2pdma_should_map_bus);
> +
>  /**
>   * pci_p2pdma_enable_store - parse a configfs/sysfs attribute store
>   *		to enable p2pdma
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-p2pdma.h b/include/linux/pci-p2pdma.h
> index 8318a97c9c61..fc5de47eeac4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci-p2pdma.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci-p2pdma.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ int pci_p2pdma_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
>  		int nents, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs);
>  void pci_p2pdma_unmap_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
>  		int nents, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs);
> +u64 pci_p2pdma_bus_offset(struct page *page);
> +int pci_p2pdma_should_map_bus(struct device *dev, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap);
>  int pci_p2pdma_enable_store(const char *page, struct pci_dev **p2p_dev,
>  			    bool *use_p2pdma);
>  ssize_t pci_p2pdma_enable_show(char *page, struct pci_dev *p2p_dev,
> @@ -83,6 +85,15 @@ static inline void pci_p2pmem_free_sgl(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  static inline void pci_p2pmem_publish(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool publish)
>  {
>  }
> +static inline u64 pci_p2pdma_bus_offset(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	return -1;
> +}
> +static inline int pci_p2pdma_should_map_bus(struct device *dev,
> +					    struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
> +{
> +	return -1;
> +}
>  static inline int pci_p2pdma_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev,
>  		struct scatterlist *sg, int nents, enum dma_data_direction dir,
>  		unsigned long attrs)
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>