[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52cbaf9b-0680-6a4d-8d42-cd5f6d7f5714@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:40:53 +0800
From: "wanghai (M)" <wanghai38@...wei.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
CC: <quentin@...valent.com>, <mrostecki@...nsuse.org>,
<ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <kafai@...com>,
<songliubraving@...com>, <yhs@...com>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
<kpsingh@...omium.org>, <toke@...hat.com>,
<danieltimlee@...il.com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf] tools: bpftool: Add missing close before bpftool
net attach exit
在 2020/11/10 12:33, John Fastabend 写道:
> Wang Hai wrote:
>> progfd is created by prog_parse_fd(), before 'bpftool net attach' exit,
>> it should be closed.
>>
>> Fixes: 04949ccc273e ("tools: bpftool: add net attach command to attach XDP on interface")
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> v1->v2: use cleanup tag instead of repeated closes
>> tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c | 14 ++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c
>> index 910e7bac6e9e..1ac7228167e6 100644
>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c
>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c
>> @@ -578,8 +578,8 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
>>
>> ifindex = net_parse_dev(&argc, &argv);
>> if (ifindex < 1) {
>> - close(progfd);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto cleanup;
>> }
>>
>> if (argc) {
>> @@ -587,8 +587,8 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
>> overwrite = true;
>> } else {
>> p_err("expected 'overwrite', got: '%s'?", *argv);
>> - close(progfd);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto cleanup;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -600,13 +600,15 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> I think now that return value depends on this err it should be 'if (err)'
> otherwise we risk retunring non-zero error code from do_attach which
> will cause programs to fail.
I agree with you. Thanks.
>> if (err < 0) {
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> if (err) {
>
>> p_err("interface %s attach failed: %s",
>> attach_type_strings[attach_type], strerror(-err));
>> - return err;
>> + goto cleanup;
>> }
>>
>> if (json_output)
>> jsonw_null(json_wtr);
>>
>> - return 0;
>
> Alternatively we could add an 'err = 0' here, but above should never
> return a value >0 as far as I can see.
It's true that 'err > 0' doesn't exist currently , but adding 'err = 0'
would make the code clearer. Thanks for your advice.
>> +cleanup:
>> + close(progfd);
>> + return err;
>> }
>>
>> static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
Can it be fixed like this?
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c
@@ -578,8 +578,8 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
ifindex = net_parse_dev(&argc, &argv);
if (ifindex < 1) {
- close(progfd);
- return -EINVAL;
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto cleanup;
}
if (argc) {
@@ -587,8 +587,8 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
overwrite = true;
} else {
p_err("expected 'overwrite', got: '%s'?", *argv);
- close(progfd);
- return -EINVAL;
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto cleanup;
}
}
@@ -597,16 +597,19 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
err = do_attach_detach_xdp(progfd, attach_type, ifindex,
overwrite);
- if (err < 0) {
+ if (err) {
p_err("interface %s attach failed: %s",
attach_type_strings[attach_type], strerror(-err));
- return err;
+ goto cleanup;
}
if (json_output)
jsonw_null(json_wtr);
- return 0;
+ ret = 0;
+cleanup:
+ close(progfd);
+ return err;
}
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists