lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <661de7b2-b910-0e4f-42a4-8a0238d99fc8@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:23:14 +0800
From:   Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>
To:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
CC:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: fix missing destroy_workqueue() on
 error in scmi_notification_init



在 2020/11/10 1:51, Cristian Marussi 写道:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 05:15:17PM +0800, Qinglang Miao wrote:
>> Add the missing destroy_workqueue() before return from
>> scmi_notification_init in the error handling case when
>> fails to do devm_kcalloc().
>>
>> Fixes: bd31b249692e ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification dispatch and delivery")
>> Signed-off-by: Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c | 4 +++-
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c
>> index 2754f9d01636..3048e57d9731 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c
>> @@ -1476,8 +1476,10 @@ int scmi_notification_init(struct scmi_handle *handle)
>>   
>>   	ni->registered_protocols = devm_kcalloc(handle->dev, SCMI_MAX_PROTO,
>>   						sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
>> -	if (!ni->registered_protocols)
>> +	if (!ni->registered_protocols) {
>> +		destroy_workqueue(ni->notify_wq);
>>   		goto err;
>> +	}
>>   
> 
> Good catch, looks good to me.
> 
> Even better you could move the above alloc_workqueue() block down here
> so that you can avoid all together the additional destroy_workqueue() on
> the above error path.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Cristian
It sounds convincible to me Cristian, thanks for your advice ;D

I will send a v2 patch on this one in no time.
> 
> 
>>   	mutex_init(&ni->pending_mtx);
>>   	hash_init(ni->pending_events_handlers);
>> -- 
>> 2.23.0
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> .
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ