[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201110103221.GC2594@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:32:21 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/7] preempt/dynamic: Provide
irqentry_exit_cond_resched() static call
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 01:56:08AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> [convert from static key to static call, only define static call when
> PREEMPT_DYNAMIC]
> noinstr void irqentry_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, irqentry_state_t state)
> {
> @@ -383,8 +386,13 @@ noinstr void irqentry_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, irqentry_state_t state)
> }
>
> instrumentation_begin();
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION))
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION)) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMT_DYNAMIC
> + static_call(irqentry_exit_cond_resched)();
> +#else
> irqentry_exit_cond_resched();
> +#endif
> + }
> /* Covers both tracing and lockdep */
> trace_hardirqs_on();
> instrumentation_end();
The reason I had this a static_branch() is that because if you look at
the code-gen of this function, you'll find it will inline the call.
Not sure it matters much, but it avoids a CALL+RET.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists