lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:39:38 +0100
From:   "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>
Cc:     Pawel Laszczak <pawell@...ence.com>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "balbi@...nel.org" <balbi@...nel.org>,
        "colin.king@...onical.com" <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        "rogerq@...com" <rogerq@...com>, Rahul Kumar <kurahul@...ence.com>,
        "nsekhar@...com" <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] usb: cdns3: Moves reusable code to separate
 module

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:21:22AM +0000, Peter Chen wrote:
> On 20-11-10 09:20:54, Pawel Laszczak wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > >>
> > >>  int cdns3_hw_role_switch(struct cdns3 *cdns);
> > >> -int cdns3_init(struct cdns3 *cdns);
> > >> -int cdns3_remove(struct cdns3 *cdns);
> > >> +extern int cdns3_init(struct cdns3 *cdns);
> > >> +extern int cdns3_remove(struct cdns3 *cdns);
> > >
> > >Why add "extern" here and below?
> > >
> > 
> > These functions are the API between cdnsp and cdns3 modules.
> > It's looks like a common approach in kernel.
> > Many or even most of API function in kernel has "extern". 
> > 
> 
> Even you have not written "extern" keyword, the "extern" is
> added implicitly by compiler. Usually, we use "extern" for variable
> or the function is defined at assembly. You could see some
> "extern" keyword use cases at include/linux/device.h.

We are moving away from using this keyword for functions now, if at all
possible please.  Only use it for variables, I think checkpatch now
catches it as well.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ