linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: fix mtk_clk_register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1604972321.16474.9.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:38:41 +0800
From:   Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Owen Chen <owen.chen@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: fix mtk_clk_register_mux() as static
 function

On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 11:20 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 05:37:07PM +0800, Weiyi Lu wrote:
> > mtk_clk_register_mux() should be a static function
> > 
> > Fixes: a3ae549917f16 ("clk: mediatek: Add new clkmux register API")
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> 
> Why is this for stable trees?

Hi Greg,

My Mistake. Indeed, this is not a bug fix for stable tree.
And there are simple questions.
Will I be allowed to keep the fixes tag in this patch to indicate the
mistakes we made in previous commit if it's not a bug fix for stable
tree?
And all I need to do now is to remove stable tree from cc list. Is it
correct?

Many thanks.

>