linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] sched: Get rid of select_task_rq()'s sd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201110125242.GI2594@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 13:52:42 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] sched: Get rid of select_task_rq()'s sd_flag
 parameter

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 06:45:11PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> This is v4 of that one series I've had stashed for a while [1]. I haven't
> revisited the outstanding discussion bits, the most interesting part being that
> we could get rid of the for_each_domain() loop in select_task_rq_fair() (or at
> the very least simplify it). In any case, the first few patches are IMO a decent
> cleanup on their own, hence me resubmitting them. 

Thanks!