[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201110141928.GC22336@otc-nc-03>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 06:19:28 -0800
From: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"Dey, Megha" <megha.dey@...el.com>,
"maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "Lu, Baolu" <baolu.lu@...el.com>,
"Kumar, Sanjay K" <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"jing.lin@...el.com" <jing.lin@...el.com>,
"kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"parav@...lanox.com" <parav@...lanox.com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"netanelg@...lanox.com" <netanelg@...lanox.com>,
"shahafs@...lanox.com" <shahafs@...lanox.com>,
"yan.y.zhao@...ux.intel.com" <yan.y.zhao@...ux.intel.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Ortiz, Samuel" <samuel.ortiz@...el.com>,
"Hossain, Mona" <mona.hossain@...el.com>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/17] PCI: add SIOV and IMS capability detection
Hi David
I did't follow the support for 32768 CPUs in guest without IR support.
Can you tell me how that is done?
On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 03:25:57PM -0800, Ashok Raj wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 06:34:55PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > >
> > > When we do interrupt remapping support in guest which would be required
> > > if we support x2apic in guest, I think this is something we should look into more
> > > carefully to make this work.
> >
> > No, interrupt remapping is not required for X2APIC in guests
> >
> > They can have X2APIC and up to 32768 CPUs without needing interrupt
>
> How is this made available today without interrupt remapping?
>
> I thought without IR, the destination ID is still limited to only 8 bits?
>
> On native, even if you have less than 255 cpu's but the APICID are sparsly
> distributed due to platform rules, the x2apic id could be more than 8 bits.
> Which is why the spec requires IR when x2apic is enabled.
>
> > remapping at all. Only if they want more than 32768 vCPUs, or to do
> > nested virtualisation and actually remap for the benefit of *their*
> > (L2+) guests would they need IR.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists