linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add API for dynamic thermal power management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 15:04:33 +0000
From:   Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        rui.zhang@...el.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "open list:GENERIC INCLUDE/ASM HEADER FILES" 
        <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add API for dynamic thermal
 power management



On 11/10/20 2:59 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 10/11/2020 12:05, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>
>> Actually I've found one issue when I have been trying to clean
>> my testing branch with modified scmi-cpufreq.c.
> 
> IMO, those errors are not the dtpm framework fault but the scmi-cpufreq.

True, I have added this proposed macro directly into driver, but it's
not strictly the framework.

> 
> You should add a component in the drivers/powercap which does the glue
> between the scmi-cpufreq and the dtpm. No stub will be needed in this
> case as the component will depend on CONFIG_DTPM.
> 
> 
> 
> 

Make sense, the glue stick should take care in this scenario.

In this case, please keep the Reviewed-by and Tested-by and ignore
the previous email.