lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 07:50:44 -0800 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Aditya <yashsri421@...il.com>, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: add fix option for MISSING_SIGN_OFF On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 16:39 +0530, Aditya wrote: > On 11/11/20 4:00 pm, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 10:01 AM Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@...il.com> wrote: > > > > > > Currently checkpatch warns us if there is no 'Signed-off-by' line > > > for the patch. > > > > > > E.g., running checkpatch on commit 9ac060a708e0 ("leaking_addresses: > > > Completely remove --version flag") reports this error: > > > > > > ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s) > > > > > > Provide a fix by adding a Signed-off-by line corresponding to the author > > > of the patch before the patch separator line. Also avoid this error for > > > the commits where some typo is present in the sign off. [] > > I think it should still warn about a Missing Signed-off-by: even when > > we know there is a $non_standard_signature. So, checkpatch simply > > emits two warnings; that is okay in that case. > > > > It is just that our evaluation shows that the provided fix option > > should not be suggested when there is a $non_standard_signature > > because we actually would predict that there is typo in the intended > > Signed-off-by tag and the fix that checkpatch would suggest would not > > be adequate. > > > > Joe, what is your opinion? > > > > Aditya, it should not be too difficult to implement the rule that way, right? > > > > No, I'd probably just have to add the check with $fix, instead of with > $signoff I think it does not matter much which is chosen. The bad signed-off-by: line would still need to be corrected one way or another and the added signed-off-line is also possibly incorrect so it could need to be modified or deleted.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists