linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V9 1/4] perf/core: Add PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:52:51 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, mingo@...hat.com,
        acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        jolsa@...hat.com, eranian@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
        benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, vbabka@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 1/4] perf/core: Add PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE

On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 03:30:22PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 01:43:57PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > +	if (pud_leaf(pud)) {
> >  #ifdef pud_page
> > -		page = pud_page(*pud);
> > -		if (PageHuge(page))
> > -			return page_size(compound_head(page));
> > +		if (!pud_devmap(pud)) {
> > +			page = pud_page(pud);
> > +			if (PageHuge(page))
> > +				return page_size(compound_head(page));
> > +		}
> >  #endif
> >  		return 1ULL << PUD_SHIFT;
> 
> This confuses me.  Why only special-case hugetlbfs pages here?  Should
> they really be treated differently from THP?

Do we have non-pagetable aligned THP ? I thought THP was always PUD
sized.

> If you want to consider that we might be mapping a page that's twice
> as big as a PUD entry and this is only half of it, then the simple way
> is:
> 
> 	if (pud_leaf(pud)) {
> #ifdef pud_page
> 		page = compound_head(pud_page(*pud));
> 		return page_size(page);
> #else
> 		return 1ULL << PUD_SHIFT;
> #endif
> 	}
> 
> Also, what's up with the special-casing of devmap pages here?  Did the
> devmap people fuck up their compound pages?  If so, they should fix their
> shit, not expect the rest of the kernel to work around this brokenness.

Well, the PTE code we have today (in tip/perf/core) is:

	pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
	if (!pte_present(*pte)) {
		pte_unmap(pte);
		return 0;
	}

	page = pte_page(*pte);
	if (PageHuge(page)) {
		u64 size = page_size(compound_head(page));
		pte_unmap(pte);
		return size;
	}

	pte_unmap(pte);
	return PAGE_SIZE;

and that's crashing in PageHuge()'s PageCompound() test. Clearly I
should be checking pte_special() here (as well as all the READ_ONCE()s I
added in the patch you just commented on). But I wasn't quite sure about
devmap and paranoia won.

You're saying devmap should be valid compound pages? Then I can remove
all that and only keep pte_special().