lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:57:07 +0100
From:   Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To:     Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
        Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
        Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 43/44] kasan: add documentation for hardware tag-based mode

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:12 PM Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Add documentation for hardware tag-based KASAN mode and also add some
> clarifications for software tag-based mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> ---
> Change-Id: Ib46cb444cfdee44054628940a82f5139e10d0258

> +
> +Software tag-based KASAN currently only supports tagging of slab memory.

I think the reader may confuse "slab memory" here with "memory
returned by SLAB" (as opposed to SLUB).
Maybe "heap memory" is less ambiguous?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ