[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:26:20 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
daniel@...ll.ch, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: simplify follow_pte{,pmd}
On 11.11.20 09:18, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 06:21:22PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>> Sorry, I think this patch may be causing a regression for us for s390?
>> https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/432129279#L768
>>
>> (via https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20201029101432.47011-3-hch@lst.de)
>
> Hmm, the call to follow_pte_pmd in the s390 code does not actually exist
> in my tree.
This is a mid-air collision in linux-next between
b2ff5796a934 ("mm: simplify follow_pte{,pmd}")
a67a88b0b8de ("s390/pci: remove races against pte updates")
Powered by blists - more mailing lists