[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:18:31 +0800
From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<akinobu.mita@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <prime.zeng@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] libfs: fix error cast of negative value in
simple_attr_write()
Hi,
Thanks for reviewing this.
On 2020/11/11 3:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:25:24 +0800 Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com> wrote:
>
>> The attr->set() receive a value of u64, but simple_strtoll() is used
>> for doing the conversion. It will lead to the error cast if user inputs
>> a negative value.
>>
>> Use kstrtoull() instead of simple_strtoll() to convert a string got
>> from the user to an unsigned value. The former will return '-EINVAL' if
>> it gets a negetive value, but the latter can't handle the situation
>> correctly.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/fs/libfs.c
>> +++ b/fs/libfs.c
>> @@ -977,7 +977,9 @@ ssize_t simple_attr_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
>> goto out;
>>
>> attr->set_buf[size] = '\0';
>> - val = simple_strtoll(attr->set_buf, NULL, 0);
>> + ret = kstrtoull(attr->set_buf, 0, &val);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out;
>> ret = attr->set(attr->data, val);
>> if (ret == 0)
>> ret = len; /* on success, claim we got the whole input */
> kstrtoull() takes an `unsigned long long *', but `val' is a u64.
>
> I think this probably works OK on all architectures (ie, no 64-bit
> architectures are using `unsigned long' for u64). But perhaps `val'
> should have type `unsigned long long'?
the attr->set() takes 'val' as u64, so maybe we can stay it unchanged here
if it works well.
Thanks,
Yicong
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists