linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: include sparsemem.h for MAX_PHYSMEM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:04:16 +0200
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        ngupta@...are.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: include sparsemem.h for MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS

On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 11:57:02AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 11:26 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 10:33:29AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 5:21 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 12:21:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > To be on the safe side, we could provoke a compile-time error
> > > > > when CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is set on a 32-bit
> > > > > architecture, but MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS is not set.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe compile time warning and a runtime error in zs_init() if 32 bit
> > > > machine has memory above 4G?
> > >
> > > If the fix is as easy as adding a single line in a header, I think a
> > > compile-time
> > > error makes it easier, no need to wait for someone to boot a broken
> > > system before fixing it.
> >
> > Not sure it would be as easy as adding a single line in a header for
> > MIPS with it's diversity.
> 
> I looked up the architecture, and found:
> 
> - The pre-MIPS32r1 cores only support 32-bit addressing
> - octeon selects PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT but no longer
>   supports 32-bit kernels
> - Alchemy and netlogic (XLR, XLP) have 36-bit addressing
> - CONFIG_XPA implies 40-bit addressing

Fair enough. A typo below.

> We should run it by the MIPS maintainers, but I think this patch
> is sufficient:
> 
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-32.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-32.h
> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static inline void pmd_clear(pmd_t *pmdp)
> 
>  #if defined(CONFIG_XPA)
> 
> +#define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS 40
>  #define pte_pfn(x)             (((unsigned long)((x).pte_high >>
> _PFN_SHIFT)) | (unsigned long)((x).pte_low << _PAGE_PRESENT_SHIFT))
>  static inline pte_t
>  pfn_pte(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
> @@ -169,6 +170,7 @@ pfn_pte(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
> 
>  #elif defined(CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_CPU_MIPS32)
> 
> +#define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS 35

                                    ^ 36 ?

>  #define pte_pfn(x)             ((unsigned long)((x).pte_high >> 6))
> 
>  static inline pte_t pfn_pte(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
> @@ -183,6 +185,7 @@ static inline pte_t pfn_pte(unsigned long pfn,
> pgprot_t prot)
> 
>  #else
> 
> +#define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS 32
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_VR41XX
>  #define pte_pfn(x)             ((unsigned long)((x).pte >> (PAGE_SHIFT + 2)))
>  #define pfn_pte(pfn, prot)     __pte(((pfn) << (PAGE_SHIFT + 2)) |
> pgprot_val(prot))
> 
>      Arnd

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.