lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=VS7afjd4mXHvc+FcK=cnQC=SjEOJL6phkFLSWxP8+uaw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:41:18 +0100
From:   Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
        Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
        Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 44/44] kselftest/arm64: Check GCR_EL1 after context switch

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 5:09 PM Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 16:59, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:12 PM Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
> > >
> > > This test is specific to MTE and verifies that the GCR_EL1 register
> > > is context switched correctly.
> > >
> > > It spawn 1024 processes and each process spawns 5 threads. Each thread
> >
> > Nit: "spawns"
> >
> >
> > > +       srand(time(NULL) ^ (pid << 16) ^ (tid << 16));
> > > +
> > > +       prctl_tag_mask = rand() % 0xffff;
> >
> > Nit: if you want values between 0 and 0xffff you probably want to use
> > bitwise AND.
>
> Another question would be, is the max here meant to be 0xffff or
> 0xffff-1. Because, as-is now, it's 0xffff-1. Only one of them has a
> trivial conversion to bitwise AND ( x % 2^n == x & (2^n - 1) ).

Yes, that is basically what I meant, assuming that Vincenzo wanted the
max to be 0xffff

-- 
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer

Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
80636 München

Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ