[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X61mwRe6tFrSrgQa@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:45:53 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, corbet@....net,
peterz@...radead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] seqnum_ops: Introduce Sequence Number Ops
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 09:17:27AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 11/12/20 5:36 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:23:03PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > > Agreed: this is a clear wrapping sequence counter. It's only abuse would
> > > > be using it in a place where wrapping actually is _not_ safe. (bikeshed:
> > > > can we call it wrap_u32 and wrap_u64?)
> > >
> > > Still like seqnum_ops.
> > >
> > > There is seqcount_t in seqlock.h which is a totally different feature.
> >
> > Yes, and that's why this new thing, whatever it is called should not
> > have the word "sequence" in it. People will get it confused.
>
> Any suggestions for name. I am bad with coming up with names. How does
> Statcnt API and struct statcnt along the lines of your name suggestions
> in your previous email?
What does "stat" mean here?
And I don't understand the hesitation about "sequence" in a name, as
that's exactly what this is. seqlock is different, yes.
How about "seqnum_t"? That's what we call the sequence number that we
export to uevents, a "SEQNUM".
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists