[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201112192432.GA10247@amd>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 20:24:32 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, lwn@....net,
jslaby@...e.cz
Subject: Re: Linux 4.19.157 -- fixing SGX problem?
Hi!
> I'm announcing the release of the 4.19.157 kernel.
>
> Please see the 5.9.8 announcement if you are curious if you should
> upgrade or not:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1605041246232108@kroah.com/
Quoting:
# Hint, if you are using SGX, then upgrade. And then possibly
# reconsider
# the decisions you have recently made that caused you to write special
# code to use that crazy thing. Personally, it still feels like a
# solution in search of a problem.
I agree with you that SGX is "crazy", but this makes no sense.
SGX is expected to protect enclave even from root. How does making
interface root-only solve that?
Plus, SGX is not in 4.19. I don't believe it is in mainline, either,
as the patches are still reposted. We are at v40 now...
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 16:54:06 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v40 00/24] Intel SGX foundations
ls arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx shows nothing in mainline. It shows nothing
in -next, either.
Confused,
Pavel
--
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists